Reading Response #1 Everett, J. (2003). Curriculum Mapping and Collection Mapping: Otherwise Known as “The Camel with Two Humps”. In B. K. Stripling & S. Hughes-Hassell (Eds.) Curriculum Connections through the Library (pp. 119-137). Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.
“Talk to teachers. Listen to students. Collaborate with grade levels and help write units and plan projects. Become an extension to each classroom. Avoid being a single spoke in the wheel – become the hub of resource-based learning.”
After reading and reflecting on the many roles of the school librarian, I think Jo Ann Everett sums up our role rather well in the above quote. In her chapter, Curriculum Mapping and Collection Mapping: Otherwise Known as “The Camel with Two Humps”, Everett talks about the importance of both curriculum mapping and collection mapping in every school. Both concepts seem kind of like common sense to me. Maybe it is because I have a rather type-A personality, but as I read through this chapter I wondered how school librarians handled their job before curriculum mapping and collection mapping came on the scene.
As a future school librarian, I look forward to organizing materials so they are easily accessible to students and teachers. Curriculum maps seem like a very practical way to organize and see when and where students will be taught different subjects. Since the school librarian manages all of the data and resources for the students, it only makes sense that the school library is also the hub for teachers when collaborating together to create these curriculum maps.
I have not worked in a school outside of my student teaching, but curriculum mapping seems to help turn the chaos of teaching and learning into a more organized chaos. Everett also talks about how useful a curriculum map is in creating collection maps. In her school, she was able to tailor her collection to specifically meet the needs of the curriculum. The curriculum and collection map gave her the confidence to weed a majority of the collection. She found that more volumes didn’t necessarily mean she was better supporting the students and teachers . She also brought out a good point that with budgets being cut in what seems like every educational system, a curriculum map and the collection guide really helped to focus purchases on what was needed. These two tools also helped to justify need when asking for money from the PTA, community, and when applying for grants.
After reading Everett’s chapter I have come to the conclusion that these two tools are such important and vital components to the school librarian, that without them it would be hard to do a good job.
Reading Response #2
Kallick, B. & Wilson, J.M. (2004). Curriculum Mapping and Software: Creating an Information System for a Learning Community. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Getting results with curriculum mapping (pp. 83-96). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
“In other words, communication is mediated electronically, and through that medium, mapping becomes a dynamic collaboration. Educators no longer need to wait until the next staff development session for an opportunity to observe and understand the contributions of their colleagues.”
After reading in Curriculum Connections through the Library, I was interested by the title of this chapter. In the first reading, school librarians talked about how to create curriculum and collection maps and they did not mention purchasing software to do so. In fact, there process seemed so logical, the idea of purchasing software to help with curriculum mapping seemed wasteful to me since it seemed to work just fine putting pen to paper. However, this chapter brought up some interesting points on why using technology to help with curriculum mapping is beneficial.
First of all, as stated in the quote above, using software to do curriculum mapping allows teachers and administrators to continuously work on and use the information from the curriculum maps. They do not need to wait until they can find time to meet and discuss with their peers. The map can be updated with comments after or even during a unit of study.
Second of all, having curriculum maps and data in electronic form allows teachers across the entire district to see what is being taught, when it is being taught, what assessments are used, etc. I see this being valuable especially in districts where several elementary schools flow into one large junior and senior high. The district wide curriculum map can make sure that all students are coming to junior and senior high with the same background and knowledge. I also think it would be helpful to share what is working well in a particular school with the other schools in the district.
Finally, curriculum mapping software allows educators to run reports and easily see gaps and overlaps in the curriculum that otherwise might not have been noticed or would have taken longer to notice. As the authors discussed, it is very convenient for teachers to be able to do keyword searches and queries in the maps to find data on their units taught by other teachers.
Overall, if a district is new to curriculum mapping, it might be a leap to start off using a curriculum mapping software. Software certainly isn’t required to reap the benefits of curriculum mapping; however, it does seem like it would make the job a lot easier and more effective. I have often been told in my work that it is better to work “smarter” than “harder”. After reading this chapter, I believe that curriculum mapping software is a great tool to help educators work smarter.